<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Backend on Evan Hoffman</title><link>https://evan.wtf/tags/backend/</link><description>Recent content in Backend on Evan Hoffman</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>Evan Hoffman</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://evan.wtf/tags/backend/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Moving an Exchange 2003 server to another location with minimal risk and disruption?</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2010/04/14/moving-an-exchange-2003-server-to-another-location-with-minimal-risk-and-disruption/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:38:51 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2010/04/14/moving-an-exchange-2003-server-to-another-location-with-minimal-risk-and-disruption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So our Exchange server is located in our office building. This made sense at the time because that&amp;rsquo;s where the users are. Over time though, this has proved problematic for a few reasons. Primarily, our office is certainly not a datacenter and doesn&amp;rsquo;t offer the amenities of one - clean, reliable power, and redundant cooling. In an average year we lose power probably 10-15 times, often for an hour or more. The rest of our production environment is hosted in a top-tier datacenter, so after a while I started to wonder why our Exchange server wasn&amp;rsquo;t there, and making plans to move it there. Oh, and did I mention I&amp;rsquo;m not an Exchange admin in any sense of the term? I just inherited the Exchange server about 2 months ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>