<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Licensing on Evan Hoffman</title><link>https://evan.wtf/tags/licensing/</link><description>Recent content in Licensing on Evan Hoffman</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>Evan Hoffman</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://evan.wtf/tags/licensing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>VMWare 5's new licensing model.</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2011/07/17/vmware-5s-new-licensing-model-2/</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:20:56 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2011/07/17/vmware-5s-new-licensing-model-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After reading up on the new VMware licensing&amp;amp;pricing model I understand the uproar. Limiting vRAM is a reasonable constraint, but 32GB per socket for Enterprise? 48 GB for &amp;ldquo;Enterprise Plus&amp;rdquo;? If you have a dual CPU server with 144 GB (easily configurable last year), with 4.1 you&amp;rsquo;d only need 2 enterprise licenses to use all 144 GB, since in 4.1 an &amp;ldquo;Enterprise&amp;rdquo; license covered 1 CPU (up to 6 cores) and up to 256 GB memory on the host.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>