<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Microsoft on Evan Hoffman</title><link>https://evan.wtf/tags/microsoft/</link><description>Recent content in Microsoft on Evan Hoffman</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>Evan Hoffman</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://evan.wtf/tags/microsoft/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Autodiscover mysteriously stopped working (Exchange 2010)</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2011/03/01/autodiscover-mysteriously-stopped-working-exchange-2010/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:30:30 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2011/03/01/autodiscover-mysteriously-stopped-working-exchange-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had &lt;a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124251.aspx"&gt;Autodiscover&lt;/a&gt; working for months but recently it just stopped. I&amp;rsquo;m not sure why, but it may be related to removing the last Exchange 2003 servers from service recently. Maybe some setting got wiped from AD when I uninstalled Exchange 2003 (as per &lt;a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb288905%28EXCHG.80%29.aspx"&gt;the procedure&lt;/a&gt; Microsoft gives). Basically what was happening was that the email address field was being autopopulated by the user&amp;rsquo;s UPN rather than their email address. Since we have a &lt;a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/300684"&gt;single label domain&lt;/a&gt;, the UPN isn&amp;rsquo;t a valid email address, and autodiscovery fails.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Office 2007's awful user interface</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2010/08/02/microsoft-office-2007s-awful-user-interface-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:48:49 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2010/08/02/microsoft-office-2007s-awful-user-interface-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Office 2007 is pretty old by now, and I know much has been written on the move from a &amp;ldquo;normal&amp;rdquo; looking app to the &amp;ldquo;Ribbon&amp;rdquo; UI. I personally hate the change and feel Microsoft just changed the UI as a way to make the application look &amp;ldquo;different&amp;rdquo; so that people will look at it and go &amp;ldquo;oooh, shiny!&amp;rdquo; and not feel as bad about being forced into another $400 upgrade of a word processor. Sure, Excel&amp;rsquo;s row limit was finally raised beyond 64k, and I&amp;rsquo;m sure there were some other tweaks, but .docx? .xlsx? Yet more file formats, ensuring most businesses will feel compelled to upgrade. If your clients are upgrading, you&amp;rsquo;re going to have to.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Office 2007's awful user interface</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2010/08/02/microsoft-office-2007s-awful-user-interface/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:48:49 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2010/08/02/microsoft-office-2007s-awful-user-interface/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Office 2007 is pretty old by now, and I know much has been written on the move from a &amp;ldquo;normal&amp;rdquo; looking app to the &amp;ldquo;Ribbon&amp;rdquo; UI. I personally hate the change and feel Microsoft just changed the UI as a way to make the application look &amp;ldquo;different&amp;rdquo; so that people will look at it and go &amp;ldquo;oooh, shiny!&amp;rdquo; and not feel as bad about being forced into another $400 upgrade of a word processor. Sure, Excel&amp;rsquo;s row limit was finally raised beyond 64k, and I&amp;rsquo;m sure there were some other tweaks, but .docx? .xlsx? Yet more file formats, ensuring most businesses will feel compelled to upgrade. If your clients are upgrading, you&amp;rsquo;re going to have to.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Outlook 2007 &amp; Exchange 2010 Autodiscover SSL certificate error annoyance</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2010/07/27/outlook-2007-exchange-2010-autodiscover-ssl-certificate-error-annoyance/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:51:54 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2010/07/27/outlook-2007-exchange-2010-autodiscover-ssl-certificate-error-annoyance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the more annoying side effects of migrating my mailbox to Exchange 2010 has been the nagging of Outlook 2007&amp;rsquo;s Autodiscovery feature. Now, every time I start Outlook I get hit with a certificate error for autodiscover.domain.com. Now, autodiscover.domain.com is a CNAME to mail.domain.com, which is the OWA URL for the CAS. The SSL certificate is valid - but it&amp;rsquo;s valid for mail.domain.com. I could buy &lt;a href="http://affiliate.godaddy.com/redirect/57C9CDCFC2D9286731DFC80559FF75B02AA47A2EADDA2D5CC2407E21C4FBC792" title="Go Daddy $12.99 SSL Sale!"&gt;a SSL certificate from GoDaddy for $12.99&lt;/a&gt; (an insanely great price, btw) for &amp;ldquo;autodiscover&amp;rdquo; but that would also require using another IP address on the CAS (since you can can only bind one SSL certificate to an IP:port pair), and that seems like a waste of an IP address.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When single-sign-on isn't.</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2010/07/16/when-single-sign-on-isnt-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:09:22 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2010/07/16/when-single-sign-on-isnt-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m looking into training courses for Exchange 2010, and to add a course to &amp;ldquo;My Learning,&amp;rdquo; which I guess is the equivalent of a shopping cart, I had to sign in with my Live.com ID. I have a Live.com ID because you need one to see your MS licenses and download ISOs, etc. It&amp;rsquo;s not as seamless as Google&amp;rsquo;s ID but it seems to work ok most of the time. But here&amp;rsquo;s an instance where it sucks:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When single-sign-on isn't.</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2010/07/16/when-single-sign-on-isnt/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:09:22 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2010/07/16/when-single-sign-on-isnt/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m looking into training courses for Exchange 2010, and to add a course to &amp;ldquo;My Learning,&amp;rdquo; which I guess is the equivalent of a shopping cart, I had to sign in with my Live.com ID. I have a Live.com ID because you need one to see your MS licenses and download ISOs, etc. It&amp;rsquo;s not as seamless as Google&amp;rsquo;s ID but it seems to work ok most of the time. But here&amp;rsquo;s an instance where it sucks:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Exchange 2010 and Set-ActiveSyncVirtualDirectory Identity</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2010/07/12/exchange-2010-and-set-activesyncvirtualdirectory-identity/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:43:21 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2010/07/12/exchange-2010-and-set-activesyncvirtualdirectory-identity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;rsquo;t really know why I put this blog up, but generally I write stuff here after I muddle through some ridiculous problem that may have ended up being easily resolved, but whose solution was hard to find. That&amp;rsquo;s definitely the case with this post. Currently I&amp;rsquo;m in the middle of moving my company&amp;rsquo;s email from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. Microsoft has provided some pretty good &lt;a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998604.aspx"&gt;documentation&lt;/a&gt; on how to do this, but they do assume a certain level of familiarity with the product. For example, I probably spent 30 minutes trying to run Exchange cmdlets in Powershell before I realized there&amp;rsquo;s a special shell just for Exchange, the Exchange Management Shell.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hygiene Management?</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2010/06/03/hygiene-management/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:55:39 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2010/06/03/hygiene-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m installing Exchange 2010 and in the docs it shows a bunch of groups that get created in the AD Schema during the domain prep part. After running prep, I looked to see if the groups were there, and sure enough they were (yay). What caught my eye was that one of the groups is called &lt;strong&gt;Hygiene Management&lt;/strong&gt;. I thought maybe this was an Easter Egg from MS, but &lt;a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd776125.aspx"&gt;apparently&lt;/a&gt; it&amp;rsquo;s just the name of the group of people who can manage the Exchange antivirus/antispam features. Still funny though.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Generate a report of Exchange mailbox sizes broken out by department and location</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2010/04/29/generate-a-report-of-exchange-mailbox-sizes-broken-out-by-department-and-location/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:44:44 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2010/04/29/generate-a-report-of-exchange-mailbox-sizes-broken-out-by-department-and-location/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I found a script a few months ago that generated a CSV report of mailbox size, which included the Mailbox Name (usually the user&amp;rsquo;s name), size in Kbytes, number of items, which server it&amp;rsquo;s on, etc. This was very helpful, but I wanted to see which department within the company used the most space on the mail server, and the department wasn&amp;rsquo;t one of the pieces of data included in the report. It took a while but I figured out how to do LDAP lookups in vbscript and was able to add that info, so the report now has the user&amp;rsquo;s department, office location, and quota limit in it as well as the other fields. This makes it very easy to do a PivotChart in Excel to generate a pie chart of the size by department. The script is attached - change the extension to .vbs to run it. You&amp;rsquo;ll need to plug in your Exchange server and domain controller where the placeholders currently are.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Moving an Exchange 2003 server to another location with minimal risk and disruption?</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2010/04/14/moving-an-exchange-2003-server-to-another-location-with-minimal-risk-and-disruption/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:38:51 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2010/04/14/moving-an-exchange-2003-server-to-another-location-with-minimal-risk-and-disruption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So our Exchange server is located in our office building. This made sense at the time because that&amp;rsquo;s where the users are. Over time though, this has proved problematic for a few reasons. Primarily, our office is certainly not a datacenter and doesn&amp;rsquo;t offer the amenities of one - clean, reliable power, and redundant cooling. In an average year we lose power probably 10-15 times, often for an hour or more. The rest of our production environment is hosted in a top-tier datacenter, so after a while I started to wonder why our Exchange server wasn&amp;rsquo;t there, and making plans to move it there. Oh, and did I mention I&amp;rsquo;m not an Exchange admin in any sense of the term? I just inherited the Exchange server about 2 months ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>