<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Redhat on Evan Hoffman</title><link>https://evan.wtf/tags/redhat/</link><description>Recent content in Redhat on Evan Hoffman</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>Evan Hoffman</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://evan.wtf/tags/redhat/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Problems with PostgreSQL 9.0 on CentOS 6.3 with a 2.6.32-series kernel</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2012/09/25/problems-with-postgresql-9-0-on-centos-6-3-with-a-2-6-32-series-kernel/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:20:36 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2012/09/25/problems-with-postgresql-9-0-on-centos-6-3-with-a-2-6-32-series-kernel/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: this is cross-posted from the &lt;a href="http://www.yodletechblog.com/post/problems-with-postgresql-9.0-on-centos-6.3-with-a-2.6.32-series-kernel/"&gt;Yodle Tech Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&#10;We recently migrated our Postgres database to a significantly more powerful machine. While our existing server was doing okay load-wise, we were approaching 90% full on its Postgres volume. We&amp;rsquo;d also recently acquired an awesome new PureStorage SSD-based SAN and were excited to move our database onto it. For comparison, here are the the specs for the two systems:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;table&gt;&#10;&#9;&lt;thead&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;th&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;th&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;th&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;/tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&lt;/thead&gt;&#10;&#9;&lt;tbody&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;Old server&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;New server&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;/tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;Nickname&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;DB1&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;DB2&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;/tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;CPU&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;2x 6-core &lt;a href="http://ark.intel.com/products/52576/Intel-Xeon-Processor-X5690-%2812M-Cache-3_46-GHz-6_40-GTs-Intel-QPI%29"&gt;Xeon X5690&lt;/a&gt; CPUs at 3.47GHz&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;2x 8-core &lt;a href="http://ark.intel.com/products/64596/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-2690-%2820M-Cache-2_90-GHz-8_00-GTs-Intel-QPI%29"&gt;E5-2690&lt;/a&gt; CPUs at 2.90 GHz&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;/tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;Memory&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;96 GB 1333 MHz&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;128 GB 1600 MHz&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;/tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;Storage&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;- Dell PERC H800 SAS HBA - Dell MD1220 drive enclosure - 24x 15k RPM SAS drives configured in RAID 10&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;- QLogic QLE2562 dual-port 8 Gbit FC HBA - PureStorage SSD-based SAN&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;/tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;OS&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;CentOS 5.6 x86_64&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;CentOS 6.3 x86_64&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;/tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;Kernel&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;2.6.18-238.9.1.el5&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;td&gt;2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64&lt;/td&gt;&#10;&#9;&#9;&#9;&lt;/tr&gt;&#10;&#9;&lt;/tbody&gt;&#10;&lt;/table&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;As you can probably guess, moving from spinning disk onto SSD was the centerpiece of the upgrade. We&amp;rsquo;d tested the PureStorage system pretty extensively and used it in some secondary databases and seen some amazing improvements. We were excited to see how it would handle our production workload.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>64-bit Firefox 6 on CentOS 6 x86_64 (or Fedora) with Flash 11</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2011/08/31/64-bit-firefox-6-on-centos-6-x86_64-or-fedora-with-flash-11/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:15:14 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2011/08/31/64-bit-firefox-6-on-centos-6-x86_64-or-fedora-with-flash-11/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So I&amp;rsquo;ve gone back to Linux from Mac, due to the SSD issues I had with my Macbook Pro basically making VMware unusable. A Win7 VM would grind the guest and host to a halt on the 7200 RPM SATA OEM drive, and the SSD wouldn&amp;rsquo;t work, so I put the SSD back in my HP and installed CentOS 6 x86_64. Not really ideal, but at least it works.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;CentOS 6 ships with Firefox 3.6.9, which is really old by now. Fine for a server, but I wanted FF6. I grabbed the Firefox 6.0.1 bz2 from &lt;a href="http://www.mozilla.org/community/mirrors.html"&gt;VoxCast&lt;/a&gt;, unzipped it and copied it to /usr/lib64/firefox-6. Then I ran yum remove firefox to remove 3.6.9 and avoid any issues. I tried the instructions from &lt;a href="https://evan.wtf/2010/06/09/flash-plugin-on-firefox-on-fedora-12-x86_64/"&gt;my older post&lt;/a&gt; on this subject but for whatever reason it didn&amp;rsquo;t work - I&amp;rsquo;m guessing because I&amp;rsquo;m not using the distro&amp;rsquo;s Firefox RPM.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>HOWTO: Install Flash plugin on Firefox on Fedora / CentOS / RedHat Linux</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2010/06/09/howto-install-flash-plugin-on-firefox-on-fedora-centos-redhat-linux/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 01:36:54 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2010/06/09/howto-install-flash-plugin-on-firefox-on-fedora-centos-redhat-linux/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Updated 8/31/2011 See my &lt;a href="https://evan.wtf/2011/08/31/64-bit-firefox-6-on-centos-6-x86_64-or-fedora-with-flash-11/"&gt;newer post&lt;/a&gt; on this subject.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I know I&amp;rsquo;ve been through this before because I&amp;rsquo;ve setup Fedora before and it&amp;rsquo;s working. But I just installed FC12 on my desktop at home (since my Seagate drive bricked itself a few days ago and I had to reinstall anyway) and while I finally got the Adobe Flash plugin working, it didn&amp;rsquo;t have any audio, which made YouTube kind of suck. Anyway, this of course was a solved problem, I just forgot where the fix was located&amp;hellip; but duh, it&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/Flash#On_64-bit_Fedora"&gt;on the Fedora website&lt;/a&gt;. A simple&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>