<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Speed on Evan Hoffman</title><link>https://evan.wtf/tags/speed/</link><description>Recent content in Speed on Evan Hoffman</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>Evan Hoffman</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:15:20 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://evan.wtf/tags/speed/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Slow HTTP downloads through Cisco ASA 5500</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2012/02/28/slow-http-downloads-through-cisco-asa-5500/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:15:20 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2012/02/28/slow-http-downloads-through-cisco-asa-5500/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Recently we noticed weird behavior downloading files from certain sites. The transfer would start out fast (around 10 MB/s), then after a couple of seconds it would plummet to around 9 KB/s. It didn&amp;rsquo;t happen for every file or every site: downloads from S3 buckets were still particularly fast. But some files that I remember being particularly fast were now showing this weird fast/slow/fast/slow behavior, for example the &lt;a href="http://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/6u25-b06/jdk-6u25-linux-i586-rpm.bin"&gt;Sun JDK&lt;/a&gt; and ISOs from &lt;a href="http://mirrors.rit.edu/centos/6/isos/x86_64/"&gt;rit.edu&lt;/a&gt; that used to saturate our pipe were now getting all cRAzY.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Macbook Pro locks up with SSD installed.</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2011/08/23/macbook-pro-locks-up-with-ssd-installed/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:04:54 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2011/08/23/macbook-pro-locks-up-with-ssd-installed/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few weeks ago I switched from my trusty old &lt;a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834147346"&gt;HP nc8430&lt;/a&gt; to a &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002C744K6/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=evanhoffmasho-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=217145&amp;amp;creative=399369&amp;amp;creativeASIN=B002C744K6"&gt;Macbook Pro&lt;/a&gt; (MC118LL/A) that was left spare when another employee left. I mostly enjoyed using Linux but I was tired of dealing with weird quirks like having X lock up, essentially forcing me to do a hard reboot.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;To transition, I copied my documents from Linux to Mac, then turned off the Linux laptop. Surprisingly I found I didn&amp;rsquo;t need to turn Linux back on at all.&#10;Last week, I decided to put the final nail in Linux&amp;rsquo;s coffin by taking the SSD (&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002CI41US/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=evanhoffmasho-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=217145&amp;amp;creative=399369&amp;amp;creativeASIN=B002CI41US"&gt;Corsair CMFSSD-128GBG2D&lt;/a&gt;)out of it and putting it in my Macbook. The Macbook was pretty fast (Core 2 Duo @ 2.5 GHz) but some things were noticeably slower on its 7200RPM disk than on Linux with an SSD, especially running Windows VMs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FCC Report shows Verizon much faster than Cablevision</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2011/08/11/fcc-report-shows-verizon-much-faster-than-cablevision/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:14:18 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2011/08/11/fcc-report-shows-verizon-much-faster-than-cablevision/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The FCC recently conducted a study of some of the top broadband ISPs in the country and measured customers&amp;rsquo; actual bandwidth as compared to what the ISPs advertised. FiOS really came out on top.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The report is available &lt;a href="http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/measuringbroadbandreport/Measuring_U.S._-_Main_Report_Full.pdf"&gt;on the FCC site&lt;/a&gt;. The bottom line, though, is that Verizon FiOS averaged nearly 120% of advertised speed (i.e., more than was advertised) and Cablevision was between 50% and 75% of advertised speeds. Latency (ping) was also heavily in FiOS&amp;rsquo;s favor.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>TP-Link TL-WR841ND v7 802.11n router, wireless dies after a few days</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2011/03/16/tp-link-tl-wr841nd-v7-802-11n-router-wireless-dies-after-a-few-days/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:46:57 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2011/03/16/tp-link-tl-wr841nd-v7-802-11n-router-wireless-dies-after-a-few-days/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I mentioned in &lt;a href="https://evan.wtf/2011/02/28/speed-comparison-optimum-boost-vs-verizon-fios/"&gt;a previous post&lt;/a&gt; that I got the &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0034CN0AS/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=evanhoffmasho-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=217145&amp;amp;creative=399349&amp;amp;creativeASIN=B0034CN0AS"&gt;TP-Link TL-WR841ND 802.11n wifi router&lt;/a&gt; and it solved the speed problems I was noticing with wifi connections since going from FiOS to Cablevision. This seems to be the case still, however I&amp;rsquo;ve now had another problem with the TP router. Basically, wireless becomes unusable and the web UI becomes inaccessible. The SSID still shows up but I can&amp;rsquo;t get an IP address. When accessing it from the wired LAN via a browser, the connection times out - apparently whatever&amp;rsquo;s going on inside the router is also crashing its internal webserver.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Speed comparison: Optimum Boost vs Verizon FiOS</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2011/02/28/speed-comparison-optimum-boost-vs-verizon-fios/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:26:38 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2011/02/28/speed-comparison-optimum-boost-vs-verizon-fios/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Optimum Boost advertises 30 Mbps down, 5 Mbps up. Here&amp;rsquo;s a speed test I just ran at &lt;a href="http://speedtest.net/"&gt;Ookla&amp;rsquo;s SpeedTest.net&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.speedtest.net/result/1177842728.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;(My desktop is plugged into the router, the router is plugged into the Arris cablemodem.)&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s one of the last speed tests I did with Verizon, on 2/15. I had the 25/15 internet package:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.speedtest.net/result/1157871206.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;(Desktop was plugged into 8-port Linksys 100 Mbit switch, the switch was plugged into the FiOS/ActionTec router.)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FiOS speed 10 months later, better than ever.</title><link>https://evan.wtf/2010/09/27/fios-speed-10-months-later-better-than-ever/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:44:48 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://evan.wtf/2010/09/27/fios-speed-10-months-later-better-than-ever/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I &lt;a href="https://evan.wtf/2009/12/05/fios-it-is/"&gt;switched to FiOS&lt;/a&gt; in December, 2009, and I was pretty apprehensive, having been a Cablevision customer for many years. I really had no problem with Cablevision&amp;rsquo;s service, I just thought their pricing was much too high in the face of the new competition (and deals) Verizon was offering. I ended up going with Verizon due to their awesome deal, but now it&amp;rsquo;s almost a year later and I can&amp;rsquo;t imagine going back to Optimum. It&amp;rsquo;ll probably come down to price when the current promo pricing I have with Verizon ends, but if the price was equal then no contest - I&amp;rsquo;d stick with FiOS.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>